Bowling Videos, King of TV Bowling

Classic Bowling: 1955 Buddy Bomar vs. Bill Lillard with Chris Schenkel

Posted on December 16, 2020 by Brian Halstrom

1955 Buddy Bomar vs. Bill Lillard with Chris Schenkel

We are pleased to be able to bring you another classic from the Championship Bowling Series. This 1955 telecast was recorded on location at Brunswick Lanes in Paramus, New Jersey.

Video uploaded by King of TV Bowling. What are your thoughts? Share your comments below!

MORE BOWLING ARTICLES YOU MAY ENJOY

Radical Crypto Boom and Sneak Attack Solid | June 2023 | HK22 Sym Pearl+ Dark Horse Sym Solid!

Radical Crypto Boom Bowling Ball The Crypto Boom is a pearl version of the original [...]

Brunswick Infinity | New Line | Versatile Ball Motion | New Core For All Styles!

Brunswick Infinity Bowling Ball Brunswick is excited to introduce a new level of performance with [...]

Roto Grip DUO Review With Stu Williams | Beef and Barnzy Ball Reviews

Roto Grip Duo Bowling Ball Dynamic looks – CHECK!… Dynamic motion – CHECK!… The optimum [...]

Roto Grip Duo | Baby Zen? | Ball Review by Chris Barnes

Roto Grip Duo Bowling Ball Dynamic looks – CHECK!… Dynamic motion – CHECK!… The optimum [...]

The Duo Was Meant To Come With Surface!

Roto Grip Duo Bowling Ball Dynamic looks – CHECK!… Dynamic motion – CHECK!… The optimum [...]

The Duo Really Is That Ball | Comparison With The Goat 900 Global Zen

Roto Grip Duo Bowling Ball Dynamic looks – CHECK!… Dynamic motion – CHECK!… The optimum [...]

These Two Bowling Balls Make For A Great One Two Punch! Roto Grip Duo & Exotic Gem

Roto Grip Duo Bowling Ball Dynamic looks – CHECK!… Dynamic motion – CHECK!… The optimum [...]

New Storm Summit Bowling Ball Video Review with Bowlers Rant

Storm Summit Bowling Ball Officially, this is Storm’s strongest symmetric ball to date. Starting on [...]

One thought on “Classic Bowling: 1955 Buddy Bomar vs. Bill Lillard with Chris Schenkel”

Michael A. Abbene says:
Love these shows

December 24, 2020 at 11:18 am
Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply